the
Doms have expressed
desire
the represented, but that if
with
an do so
it can
no
debt G.
^
arranged (or something of that sort.) Canada has not yet replied o aur Felt asking if they wanted thepresented
The 7-0. are
apparente going to deal separably with his king's
Question & treat il
to deligates for
refining solel
the British
fort, 1.0. gr. Bu Budia &
Crown Colanies.
The
there is
at-
aunow
the
sound.
to have more
the Hague than at Shanghai
(i.c. four, exaluding the Candia
? Concer.
24 hr mas müller had hitter h-
roed
Y telephone for biday.
as the question is
Ш.
271. Mr.27
li 27.11 K-27-11-11 $1.27.11.11
I have
Falafhank
Concurrence
به چه جو
эс
In any further communication
on this subject, please quote
No.
and address-
The Under-Secretary of State.
Foreign Office.
Immediate.
Sir:-
London.
Co 37981
210 11
Rest 27 NOV II
FOREIGN OFFICE
25th. November, 1911.
I am directed by Secretary Sir E. Grey to inform you
that the following question in Parliament has been put down
by Er. King for Monday the 27th. instant:
"To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs
"whether he will appoint a fifth representative, preferably
"a gentleman of commercial standing, to the Opium Conference
"at the Hague".
Subject to the concurrence of Ir, Secretary Harcourt
Sir E. Grey proposes to reply to this question in the
following termsp-
"The question of the representation of His Majesty's
"Government at the Opium Conference at the Hague has re-
"ceived careful consideration and it is not thought that
"any useful purpose would be served by further increasing
"the number of British Delegates."
I am, Sir,
The Under Secretary of State,
Colonial Office.
Your most obedient,
humble Servant,
Wangley
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.